Home
Log in / Sign Up
    Private Messages   Advanced Search   Rules   New User Guide   FAQ   Advertise   Contact Us  
Forum -> Working Women
Job - no College required, pays $50k after ten years



Post new topic   Reply to topic View latest: 24h 48h 72h

amother
Mustard


 

Post Sun, Mar 01 2015, 5:32 pm
Free training - Customer service job at call center, but only if the company relocates to Brooklyn.

Please click on this link and send message to company asking to relocate Call Centers to Brooklyn, New York.

http://www.fisglobal.com/about.....x.htm


Last edited by amother on Sun, Feb 07 2016, 2:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top

Jeanette




 
 
    
 

Post Sun, Mar 01 2015, 6:07 pm
Lots of if's in this little proposal...

IF the company relocates to Brooklyn, and IF you can stick it out for 10 years, AND the company doesn't decide to relocate again, AND it still exists in 10 years, THEN you can make $50K?
Back to top

bluebird




 
 
    
 

Post Mon, Mar 02 2015, 7:34 am
How much will $50K get you in ten years, given inflation?
Back to top

OneSource




 
 
    
 

Post Mon, Mar 02 2015, 10:50 am
That doesn't seem like a good deal at all! I know girls who didn't go to college and got customer service jobs at $21-$23 per hour and make around 50k per year now. Why wait 10 years?! Baffled... Rolling Eyes
Back to top

imasoftov




 
 
    
 

Post Tue, Mar 03 2015, 12:55 am
OneSource wrote:
That doesn't seem like a good deal at all! I know girls who didn't go to college and got customer service jobs at $21-$23 per hour and make around 50k per year now. Why wait 10 years?! Baffled... Rolling Eyes

I'm against child labor, even if it pays well.
Back to top

nywife




 
 
    
 

Post Tue, Mar 03 2015, 3:08 am
imasoftov wrote:
I'm against child labor, even if it pays well.


Child labor? These girls are usually straight out of high school so 18/19 years old...
Back to top

OneSource




 
 
    
 

Post Tue, Mar 03 2015, 3:20 am
To the "child laborer" commenter - I sincerely hope you are joking. What makes you think I am referring to child labor?! The fact that I used the word "girls"? Excuse me if that speaks more to my age than a highly literal reference to a female child. For the strictly literal who need me to SPELL IT OUT - 18 and 19 year olds are the demographic I am referring to! Most 18 and 19 year olds (whom I know so that would mean IMO) are very much "girls" even if married and pregnant/ new mothers. They are immature in most senses and as such, seem like girls to me.

Thanks for taking an otherwise innocent thread and turning it into a ridiculous conversation about child labor (which comes from where? Who thinks about child labor in the context of jobs earning 50k per year? Maybe if the total salary was 5k for 40+ hrs per week, my mind might go there but otherwise…)
Back to top

imasoftov




 
 
    
 

Post Tue, Mar 03 2015, 3:31 am
OneSource wrote:
To the "child laborer" commenter - I sincerely hope you are joking. What makes you think I am referring to child labor?! The fact that I used the word "girls"? Excuse me if that speaks more to my age than a highly literal reference to a female child. For the strictly literal who need me to SPELL IT OUT - 18 and 19 year olds are the demographic I am referring to! Most 18 and 19 year olds (whom I know so that would mean IMO) are very much "girls" even if married and pregnant/ new mothers. They are immature in most senses and as such, seem like girls to me.

Thanks for taking an otherwise innocent thread and turning it into a ridiculous conversation about child labor (which comes from where? Who thinks about child labor in the context of jobs earning 50k per year? Maybe if the total salary was 5k for 40+ hrs per week, my mind might go there but otherwise…)

I really don't care if my arrows miss the center of the target so long as they hit somewhere. And you're very welcome.
Back to top

OneSource




 
 
    
 

Post Tue, Mar 03 2015, 8:05 am
"I really don't care if my arrows miss the center of the target so long as they hit somewhere."

Your comments hit somewhere alright - somewhere absurd in an otherwise semi-reasonable thread. I am not sure why you feel it necessary to shoot theoretical 'arrows' when someone (I.e. myself for example) chose to express an opinion that waiting ten years to earn 50k seems odd when a female (girl, woman etc.) can earn that much now. How about you express a legitimate opinion - such as, "No, I don't agree with someone earning x over x period..." or "I don't really have an opinion at all. I dislike global warming and child labor, generally speaking." Your comment (or "arrow") was rude and I am still wondering why you chose to attack my fairly banal opinion that we as a gender can earn more, now. Please, enlighten me with another 'arrow' which hopefully will have substance for a change.
Back to top

Lady Bug




 
 
    
 

Post Tue, Mar 03 2015, 11:08 am
Chill. I took imasoftov comment lightly - a witty way to point out that anyone old enough to hold a job is no longer technically a girl.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 Recent Topics




Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum -> Working Women

Related Topics Replies Last Post
What 'qualifications' are required? 7 Yesterday at 1:48 pm View last post
I lost my job!!!!!
by amother
5 Yesterday at 6:31 am View last post
Summer job
by amother
2 Tue, Mar 26 2024, 9:14 am View last post
Shout out to an almost stranger, 10 years later!
by amother
11 Mon, Mar 25 2024, 12:43 pm View last post
Looking for an editing/tutoring job 0 Tue, Mar 19 2024, 9:22 pm View last post