Home
Log in / Sign Up
    Private Messages   Advanced Search   Rules   New User Guide   FAQ   Advertise   Contact Us  
Forum -> The Social Scene -> Entertainment
Depp v Heard
  Previous  1  2  3 29  30  31 38  39  40  Next



Post new topic    View latest: 24h 48h 72h

amother
Cognac


 

Post Thu, May 19 2022, 9:14 pm
amother [ IndianRed ] wrote:
Nobody was aware to the facts his ex business manager revealed today.

Noticed his face being concerned to what's gonna be said next

Can you link this testimony please?
Back to top

number




 
 
    
 

Post Thu, May 19 2022, 9:22 pm
amother [ Moonstone ] wrote:
Quote:
Nobody was aware to the facts his ex business manager revealed today.


What did he reveal?


https://www.insider.com/johnny.....022-5
Back to top

amother
Moonstone


 

Post Thu, May 19 2022, 9:29 pm
number wrote:
https://www.insider.com/johnny-depp-spending-habits-detailed-fired-money-manager-testimony-2022-5


Oh. I thought that was all public knowledge already. Amber's lawyers mentioned the rolling stones article a few times.
Back to top

number




 
 
    
 

Post Thu, May 19 2022, 9:34 pm
amother [ Moonstone ] wrote:
Oh. I thought that was all public knowledge already. Amber's lawyers mentioned the rolling stones article a few times.
I didn’t think I there was anything new in there but if you watch the actual video you can see a very messy office and the ex manager constantly rocking back and forth. So I guess that’s exciting lol
Back to top

amother
Fuchsia


 

Post Thu, May 19 2022, 9:48 pm
number wrote:
https://www.insider.com/johnny-depp-spending-habits-detailed-fired-money-manager-testimony-2022-5


And what does this really have to do with the case?
Back to top

number




 
 
    
 

Post Thu, May 19 2022, 10:00 pm
amother [ Fuchsia ] wrote:
And what does this really have to do with the case?
I’m not sure. Maybe to argue against Depp’s accountant’s testimony?
Back to top

amother
Rainbow


 

Post Thu, May 19 2022, 10:09 pm
number wrote:
I’m not sure. Maybe to argue against Depp’s accountant’s testimony?


To prove that Depp lied under oath.
Back to top

EMEN




 
 
    
 

Post Thu, May 19 2022, 10:14 pm
amother [ Rainbow ] wrote:
To prove that Depp lied under oath.


About what?
Back to top

amother
Rainbow


 

Post Thu, May 19 2022, 10:38 pm
EMEN wrote:
About what?


About various things.
Basically to prove him untrustworthy to the jury.
Back to top

amother
Cappuccino


 

Post Thu, May 19 2022, 11:10 pm
amother [ Rainbow ] wrote:
About various things.
Basically to prove him untrustworthy to the jury.


Going though the clips, nothing comes up as something that jd lied about
Back to top

#BestBubby




 
 
    
 

Post Fri, May 20 2022, 12:30 am
Wow, 30 pages.

And I never even heard of Heard.

I have a conspiracy theory that this is all an Act to distract
the American people from the fact that this country is
going down the toilet.
Back to top

number




 
 
    
 

Post Fri, May 20 2022, 9:00 am
Heard has 8 hrs left and Depp has 18. That’s going to be interesting.
Back to top

Rubber Ducky




 
 
    
 

Post Fri, May 20 2022, 9:04 am
I didn't know there were time limits on this. How does that work?
Back to top

number




 
 
    
 

Post Fri, May 20 2022, 10:01 am
Rubber Ducky wrote:
I didn't know there were time limits on this. How does that work?
There aren’t always time limits but this judge assigned one. I think each side got 65 hours total? Heard’s side burned through their time and Depp’s side is saving theirs. Next week Depp’s team will call up rebuttal witnesses (witnesses that can argue against Heard’s witnesses) and Heard’s team won’t have time to cross examine them.
Back to top

amother
IndianRed


 

Post Fri, May 20 2022, 10:24 am
number wrote:
There aren’t always time limits but this judge assigned one. I think each side got 65 hours total? Heard’s side burned through their time and Depp’s side is saving theirs. Next week Depp’s team will call up rebuttal witnesses (witnesses that can argue against Heard’s witnesses) and Heard’s team won’t have time to cross examine them.

I'm sure heards team knew what they're doing by having only 8 hrs left for the closing week
Back to top

amother
Navy


 

Post Fri, May 20 2022, 10:24 am
I also never knew about limiting time.
I found it fascinating how objections work against time.
If the objection is good it counts against the other side.
If the objection is bad it counts against the one making the objection.
It is To prevent objections to just waste time.
With it being so exact I wonder how they track time.
Back to top

amother
Orchid


 

Post Fri, May 20 2022, 11:29 am
Not sure if any of you picked up on ambers brilliant comment.

When Camille said to her ‘and now you continue to abuse him in court by lying about things he never did to you’ she answered ‘that’s not true. You can look online to prove that’.

That was a brilliant move on her part bec jury is not allowed to look online so she is implanting ideas into the jury’s’ heads that the internet is full of ‘go amber boo Johnny’.

Very unimpressed w her brilliant manipulation. All narcissists are brilliant at manipulating. And this example wowed me too.
Back to top

amother
Snowflake


 

Post Fri, May 20 2022, 11:31 am
number wrote:
Heard has 8 hrs left and Depp has 18. That’s going to be interesting.


It's interesting that heard's lawyers spent so much time on taped depositions. People don't have the attention span to watch and pay attention for that long, so a lot of that was wasted on the jury IMO.
Back to top

amother
Snowflake


 

Post Fri, May 20 2022, 11:36 am
amother [ IndianRed ] wrote:
I'm sure heards team knew what they're doing by having only 8 hrs left for the closing week


Heard's team, in general, do not give the impression of knowing what they're doing. They (particularly the lead female lawyer) kvetch and argue with the judge quite a bit in a very unappealing way, and seem quite unprepared to rephrase and redirect after basic objections (I'm no legal expert but I can understand objections for hearsay and lack of foundation).
Back to top

amother
Cappuccino


 

Post Fri, May 20 2022, 11:49 am
amother [ Orchid ] wrote:
Not sure if any of you picked up on ambers brilliant comment.

When Camille said to her ‘and now you continue to abuse him in court by lying about things he never did to you’ she answered ‘that’s not true. You can look online to prove that’.

That was a brilliant move on her part bec jury is not allowed to look online so she is implanting ideas into the jury’s’ heads that the internet is full of ‘go amber boo Johnny’.

Very unimpressed w her brilliant manipulation. All narcissists are brilliant at manipulating. And this example wowed me too.


However this was retracted when they proved how many hashtags #justice for jonny is trending and #aberisaabuser
Back to top
Page 30 of 40   Previous  1  2  3 29  30  31 38  39  40  Next Recent Topics




Post new topic       Forum -> The Social Scene -> Entertainment

Related Topics Replies Last Post
Anyone heard of Camp Leebeinu
by amother
3 Mon, Mar 18 2024, 1:43 pm View last post
Have you heard of a situation that looked bad but was good
by amother
43 Fri, Mar 01 2024, 7:03 am View last post
Has anyone heard of the malon resort?
by amother
7 Wed, Feb 21 2024, 10:39 am View last post
Anyone heard of Helena Kerekhazi in Westchester
by amother
0 Fri, Feb 09 2024, 1:19 pm View last post
Has anyone heard of Atlantic Septic
by amother
3 Tue, Jan 09 2024, 10:49 pm View last post