 |
|
|
|
|
Mollie
|
 Wed, Jun 16 2021, 3:38 pm
|
There has been no drop in fertility numbers in the world after 480 million people have been vaccinated. When is this ridiculously conspiracy going to end?? You need validation from a few women here on imamother? Do yourself a favor and do real research.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0 
22 
|
Optione
|
Wed, Jun 16 2021, 9:12 pm
|
I did, bH. It was actually my first cycle after going off bc which was right after my second shot.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
1
|
Frumwithallergies
|
Wed, Jun 16 2021, 10:15 pm
In case anyone was worried, preliminary reports on > 35 000 women who were vaccinated while pregnant (with mRNA vaccine) had no adverse outcomes in the NEJM:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/.....33959
I know this wasn't the primary concern of the OP, but thought it is pertinent.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
6
|
GLUE
|
Wed, Jun 16 2021, 10:39 pm
| Mollie wrote: | | There has been no drop in fertility numbers in the world after 480 million people have been vaccinated. When is this ridiculously conspiracy going to end?? You need validation from a few women here on imamother? Do yourself a favor and do real research. |
My research shows that fertility has bin dropping for decades, it fell even more when Coivd hit. There might be a slight up tick next year if every one who was waiting to get pregnant gets pregnant -don't expect it
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
2
|
amother
Honey
|
Wed, Jun 16 2021, 11:46 pm
| Frumwithallergies wrote: | In case anyone was worried, preliminary reports on > 35 000 women who were vaccinated while pregnant (with mRNA vaccine) had no adverse outcomes in the NEJM:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/.....33959
I know this wasn't the primary concern of the OP, but thought it is pertinent. |
Please tell me if I'm misreading. But that doesn't seem to be what the study is saying.
This retroactive study looked at 35,000 people enrolled in v-safe who identified as pregnant, and found that side effects, as self reported, were not different among pregnant vs non pregnant women. This was only in reference to vaccine side effects that were not pregnancy related. So pregnant women did not have higher rates of fever or swelling, for instance, among those 35,000 women. The pregnancy outcomes of 35,000 vaccinated women were not reviewed.
The study then followed up with 5,230 of the pregnant women to look at pregnancy outcomes. Some women were not eligible to be included or were not reachable. Some conceived during the wrong time for the study so were excluded.
In sum, the study looked at pregnancy outcomes for 827 women. Of which, 13.9% had some form of pregnancy loss such as stillbirth.
That number, nearly 14%, seems high to me, but now our sample size is much smaller,and the study was self-reported and not random. How valuable is this? I don't know, but very different than saying 35,000 women had no adverse pregnancy outcomes.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
3
|
| Related Topics |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
|
What classy unique things do people do for Pidyon Habens?
|
15 |
Thu, May 12 2022, 11:05 pm  |
|
|
Why do people judge working mothers?
|
118 |
Tue, May 10 2022, 10:16 pm |
|
|
When people mess with the English language...
|
166 |
Tue, May 10 2022, 12:37 pm |
|
|
S/O bank account thread where are the poor people?
|
18 |
Tue, May 03 2022, 5:04 pm |
|
|
Noom vs Second Nature
|
5 |
Wed, Apr 27 2022, 12:15 pm |
|
Imamother is a community of frum Jewish women, where you can come to relax,
socialize, debate, receive support, ask questions and much more.
© 2022 Imamother.com - All rights reserved
|  |
