Home

Parenting article (not a long one)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum -> Parenting our children

View latest: 24h 48h 72h


gryp




 
 
 


Post  Sat, Nov 19 2005, 11:04 pm
http://www.chabad.org/magazine.....AID=324044

Quote:
Everyone Can Win-Win

By Avrohom Kass

There are two types of problems between parents and children. The first is when the child owns the problem and the parent helps resolve it by using "mirror listening." In this case the parent actively listens and reflects back to the child the meaning in his or her words. The parent is on guard not to judge, analyze or resolve the child's problem. In the second case the parent owns the problem and tries to resolve it with "I" statements. "I" statements accurately describe what the parent is experiencing and does not lecture or put-down the child.

Now let us look at what to do when the "relationship" between the parent and child owns the problem. This is a case where the child is doing something that is disturbing to the parent while at the same time the child is committed to continue with what he or she is doing.

For example, Chanie is playing ball in the living room. Mom is concerned that something might get broken so she wants her to stop.

Mom: I am very nervous that if you continue playing ball in the living room something will get broken. And that will be very upsetting to me.

Chanie: But there is nothing else for me to do. It's raining outside and I am bored. You never let me do what I want.

In the above scenario both mother and daughter have a problem. Mother wants Chanie to stop playing ball and Chanie wants to play ball so she won't be bored. In this case the relationship is said to own the problem and thus neither "mirror listening" or "I" messages alone can solve the problem.

Given the volatility of the situation it would be easy for mother to raise her voice and demand, plead or argue with her daughter. This would most certainly lead to a confrontation that would continue to escalate until either mother or Chanie decided to withdraw and save their hostility and frustration for another occasion.

In the Talmud's Ethics of the Fathers (1:12) it is written, "Hillel said: Be of the disciples of Aaron, loving peace and pursuing peace..."

Commentators on this Mishnah explain that "loving peace," is the attitude a person should have towards one's friends (family members) and "pursuing peace," means one must make a great effort to secure peace even when it is very humiliating and or difficult.

One option which allows us to avoid confrontation as well as fulfill Hillel's teaching to "love peace and pursue peace" is to negotiate for a "win-win" solution, I.e., a solution that satisfies both claimant's needs and concerns.

In negotiating a solution acceptable to everyone it is essential to use both "mirror listening" and "I" messages in order to avoid blame, accusations and increased polarization of positions. Negotiation of win-win solutions are often not easy and require the utilization of all of one's communication skills and resources.

In our above example Mom wants the ball out of the living room and Chanie wants something interesting to do and does not want to be just "swept aside." A negotiated "win-win" solution might sound something like this. I have indicated the types of messages being sent within brackets:

Mom: I am very nervous that if you continue playing ball in the living room something will get broken. And that will be very upsetting to me. [Mom owning a problem, I message.]

Chanie: But there is nothing else for me to do. It’s raining outside and I am bored. You never let me do what I want. [Chanie owning a problem, you message.]

Mom: It sounds to me like you're looking for something interesting to do and that sometimes your frustrated that you can't always do what you want. [Mirror listening. Mom also corrects Chanie's cognitive distortion by changing the, "never" of her message to "sometimes."]

Chanie: Yeh, I want something interesting to do and playing ball in the living room is interesting. [I message.]

Mom: How about if instead of playing ball you read a book. [Mom suggest a win-win solution.]

Chanie: I've read all the books we have. [I message.]

Mom: How about if you call your friend Sarah and the two of you can go to the library and take-out something interesting to read. [Mom looks for another win-win solution.]

Chanie: That sounds like fun. I'll put the ball away right now. [Accepts Mom's win-win solution and voluntarily puts away the ball].

The benefits of a negotiated "win-win" solution over one imposed by the parents (which is sometimes necessary) are many:

The child is motivated to willingly honor the decision because he or she participated in the process.

The process of coming to a win-win solution allows for creativity and flexibility and thus leads to unique solutions for unique problems. This is very different from cook-book like solutions frequently found in some popular magazines and books about parenting.

Encourages children to think and accept responsibility for problems and their solutions.

When it works it eliminates the need for the parent to rely on "power and authority" to impose a solution. Power often creates mistrust, animosity and distance between children and parents.

Reduces the chances of blame and increased conflict.

Requires less enforcement by parent.

Two heads are better than one.

Has a positive affect on the parent child relationship. Creates a feeling of co-operation and respect.

There are six steps that help clarify the process of coming to a win-win solution. They may be helpful at times to keep in the back of your mind as you are struggling to come up with a satisfying solution or to actively utilize when a solution seems very difficult to find:

Defining the problem.

Generating possible solutions.

Evaluating the solutions.

Deciding which solution is best.

Determining how to implement the decision.

Assessing how well the solution solved the problem.

Two difficulties inherent with an attempted win-win solution is that it is very time consuming and sometimes an agreeable solution may not be found even after much time and energy has been invested. If it doesn't work there are always other options to try. However, also in the case that no agreeable solution can be found, the child is left with a clear message that a sincere attempt was made to include him or her in the process of finding a solution--even if in the end one has to be imposed. The effort required to find a win-win solution makes the child feel respected, heard and considered. This in turn nourishes a positive and healthy parent/child relationship as well as helping the child maintain and develop a positive self-image.


what do you think?
I think the "win-win solution" is a bunch of baloney Confused and they would both be better off if the mother would just take charge and say, "There is no ball playing in the house," and give a few alternative activities Chanie can do instead.
Back to top

Tefila




 
 
 


Post  Sat, Nov 19 2005, 11:29 pm
Quote:
what do you think?

That it's a loooong one Tongue Out and tommorrow will give u a fair answer Wink
Back to top

gryp




 
 
 


Post  Sat, Nov 19 2005, 11:41 pm
Sorry Very Happy , I dont know why it looks so long in my post. it looks pretty short on the chabad.org website.
Back to top

TzenaRena




 
 
 


Post  Sun, Nov 20 2005, 12:07 am
RG wrote:
what do you think?
I think the "win-win solution" is a bunch of baloney and they would both be better off if the mother would just take charge and say, "There is no ball playing in the house," and give a few alternative activities Chanie can do instead.


Hey RG, I agree with you Tongue Out . This sounds very much like PET - Parent Effectiveness Training, which together with its twin Teacher Effectiveness Training was the in thing maybe about 10 years ago. It looks like it made a come-back? It's a democratic approach. Authority is not seen in a positive light. I can't really recap it now, so many years later, but something about it made me reject it. I felt then that there was much in there not in consonance with Torah values. As some have expressed it raising children is not a democracy.
Back to top

Tefila




 
 
 


Post  Sun, Nov 20 2005, 10:20 am
Interesting but the way I see it. Just as no person is alike and has unique temprements what might work for one, may not work for another Exclamation so whereas I'm more for peace and loving anything to avoid confrontation Exclamation unless at times it's a must Exclamation , some r the opposite. I say as long as there is respect and and getting the child to still listen then what ever works, works What
Back to top

Motek




 
 
 


Post  Sun, Nov 20 2005, 2:51 pm
Kass' "win-win" approach - has the world gone mad? Confused
Back to top

Mandy




 
 
 


Post  Sun, Nov 20 2005, 3:07 pm
how about if we write our own.

Chanie : I want to play ball
Mom: You can choose to play ball but if something gets broken, you will have to clean it up and pay for it, either with your allowance or with extra chores, like your sister had to do last month when she accidentally broke the car window. Up to you.
Back to top
Recent Topics

Page 1 of 1 View latest: 24h 48h 72h


Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum -> Parenting our children

Related Topics Replies Last Post
Many new bakeries in BP, but not ONE Organic Produce store;(
by amother
45 Sat, Mar 23 2019, 10:27 pm View last post
No one offered to bring anything
by amother
68 Thu, Mar 21 2019, 10:41 pm View last post
Abortion long time ago
by amother
19 Thu, Mar 21 2019, 8:58 pm View last post
Last minute Costume and one liner help
by amother
4 Wed, Mar 20 2019, 7:10 pm View last post
How long to take for maternity leave?
by amother
12 Wed, Mar 20 2019, 1:00 pm View last post

Jump to: