US Embassy may not be moved to Jerusalem

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum -> In the News

Report offensive ad

View latest: 24h 48h 72h



Post  Fri, Feb 10 2017, 3:52 pm

President Donald Trump said that he is still deciding whether to move the Embassy of the United State in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, suggesting he is open to abandoning a controversial campaign promise.

“I’m thinking about it. I’m learning the issue and we’ll see what happens,” Trump told the Israeli newspaper Israel Hayom, Haaretz reported. “It’s not an easy decision. It’s been discussed for so many years. No one wants to make this decision, and I’m thinking about it seriously.”

As a candidate, Trump repeatedly promised to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and move the U.S. embassy, including in a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in September.

Since his inauguration, however, Trump has been more equivocal on the matter.

Referring to the embassy move in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity last month, Trump said, “I don’t want to talk about it yet. It’s too early.”

There is ample precedent for American presidents reneging on campaign promises to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem. Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both vowed to make the move, but decided in office that it would undermine peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.

The international community largely views the Palestinian areas of East Jerusalem as occupied territory. Few countries recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

Although Israel maintains that Jerusalem is its capital, Palestinians living under Israeli occupation have long sought to make Jerusalem their capital as well, making it a key sticking point in Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has warned Trump that moving the embassy would be “disastrous.” And Jordan’s King Abdullah told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that even Israeli intelligence officials are concerned about the implications of the decision, BuzzFeed News reported.

In the interview with Israel Hayom, Trump also indicated that he is critical of Israeli expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank.

“I want Israel to act reasonably in the peace process − and that it will finally happen after so many years. And maybe there will even be a possibility of a bigger peace than just Israel and the Palestinians. I want both sides to act reasonably, and we have a good chance at that,” Trump said.

“There is limited remaining territory. Every time you take land for a settlement, less territory remains,” he added. “I’m not someone who believes that advancing settlements is good for peace. But we are examining a number of options.”

rump’s comments are the strongest suggestion to date that he will adhere to the decades-long U.S. policy of pushing for a two-state solution that involves land concessions by Israel. Last week, White House press secretary Sean Spicer said in a statement that “the construction of new settlements or the expansion of existing settlements beyond their current borders may not be helpful in achieving” peace.

On Monday, however, the Israeli parliament passed a law retroactively legalizing major settlement blocs built on private Palestinian land. The enactment suggests that many right-wing Israeli politicians feel emboldened by Trump’s election.

Some of those same lawmakers expressed alarm at Trump’s Israel Hayom interview on Friday. Bezalel Smotrich, a member of parliament from the right-wing Jewish Home party, which is in the governing coalition, called the interview “very disturbing.”

Israel HaYom is a free daily newspaper bankrolled by American billionaire and Republican donor Sheldon Adelson. It is so well known for its pro-Netanyahu slant that it has earned the nickname “Bibi-ton,” a Hebrew portmanteau meaning “Bibi-paper.” (Netanyahu is commonly known as “Bibi,” a diminutive for Benjamin.)

There is evidence that Trump’s interview had Adelson’s official blessing. Trump dined with Adelson on Thursday evening at the White House.

On the campaign trail, Trump pleased Adelson and other right-wing supporters of Israel with his strong rhetoric praising the Middle Eastern nation and promises to undo Obama administration policies that were tougher on the Israeli government. Trump notably indicated that the U.S. would be more protective of Israel at the United Nations after former President Barack Obama effectively allowed the U.N .Security Council to pass a resolution in December condemning Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories.

Trump has nominated as U.S. Ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, a supporter of Israeli settlements in the West Bank who has compared those who are part of the liberal Israel advocacy group J Street to Jewish concentration camp guards, implying members of the organization are equivalent to Nazi collaborators. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee plans to hold a confirmation hearing for Friedman as early as next week, Haaretz reported.
Back to top



Post  Sat, Feb 11 2017, 2:48 pm
Honestly, I don't think most people here care one whit about where the embassy is, and plenty of Israelis don't think it should be moved at all. Many of us, however, would like our kids' official documents to list their place of birth as Jerusalem, Israel. That would be a significant way to acknowledge Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Back to top



Post  Sat, Feb 11 2017, 3:03 pm
In the interview with Israel Hayom, Trump also indicated that he is critical of Israeli expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank.

He also sort of implied that current settlements are not a problem. Which is a vast improvement over the previous occupant of the White House.

Not happy with the change in direction, but waiting and see how this plays out.
Back to top



Post  Sat, Feb 11 2017, 7:19 pm
What's new? All presidents do this. As candidates campaigning for votes they make promises. Once voted in, they see it ain't as easy to do as it is to say. That's why they're called campaign promises, and anyone who takes them seriously is not a realist.
Back to top



Post  Fri, Feb 17 2017, 8:08 am
Hmmm. Now what do we think?
Back to top



Post  Fri, Feb 17 2017, 8:37 am
DrMom wrote:
Hmmm. Now what do we think?

We think he's very pro Israel and all the naysayers were just naysaying.
Back to top
Recent Topics

Page 1 of 1 View latest: 24h 48h 72h

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum -> In the News

Similar Topics Replies Last Post
Jerusalem - Rav Amar: Strawberries Kosher And May Be Eaten 20 Sun, Jun 07 2009, 3:08 am View last post
by lst
israeli embassy help
by amother
3 Thu, Jan 12 2012, 6:42 pm View last post
Embassy suites NJ
by amother
2 Mon, Jul 22 2013, 1:24 pm View last post
Embassy Suites - Parsippany, NJ
by rd5081
5 Fri, Aug 15 2014, 10:51 am View last post
Shabbos getaways/ embassy suites - Parsippany nj
by amother
6 Thu, Jul 24 2014, 10:55 am View last post

Jump to:  

Report offensive ad