Women gives birth to sextuplets in Canada!

Log in / Sign Up

List of Forums + New Post Recipe Box Usergroups Following My Posts Bookmarks

Private Messages Advanced Search Rules New User Guide FAQ Advertise Contact Us

Forum -> In the News

View latest: 24h 48h 72h

Tefila

Thu, Jan 11 2007, 6:03 pm

And the rest of us multiples think we lead busy lifes ka"h Smile

http://www.thestar.com/News/article/168848
Can't wait to see the pics

mimsy7420

Thu, Jan 11 2007, 9:38 pm

There is a whole controversy with them because they are Jehova's witnesses and do not believe in blood transfusions, which babyies who are born weighing 1 pound usually need.

chocolate moose

Fri, Jan 12 2007, 10:14 am

OHHHHHHHHHHH

greenfire

Sun, Jan 21 2007, 11:09 am

WOW - 6
so tefila u have twins too - how old? I always wanted twins and my sister and I pretended we were twins. When I was preg w/1st I was told maybe twins & was disappointed - just had alot of amniotic fluid. But my 1 & 3 act like twins - so I joke around that my twins are 3 years apart.

ny21

Sun, Jan 21 2007, 11:18 am

look up the Dionne Quintuplets .

amother

Tue, Jan 30 2007, 8:05 pm

ok...silly question here...probably why I am posting anonymously embarrassed

.... I was always taught that you cannot say the J part of witnesses because it is G-ds name and we should be careful even though nobody knows how that name (ie yud key.....) is pronounced..... Anybody???? Rolling Eyes

Have I been led astray all these years?? In my house we called them the Joe Willies just to avoid saying it......

mimsy7420

Tue, Jan 30 2007, 8:22 pm

It's said with a "j" not a "y". It's two different words in my opinion. But you may be right and we are not supposed to say it.

GAMZu

Wed, Jan 31 2007, 7:10 pm

momoftwins, I looked it up. Poor children! What a life!

ny21

Wed, Jan 31 2007, 7:18 pm

I mentioned them on this site before,
the goverment of canada took them away
and put them on display.
the parents got custody of them
when they were older, they were world famous .

mimsy7420

Thu, Feb 01 2007, 11:41 am

I thought this would probably happen.
They seized 3 of the babies from their parents because they were refusing to let them have blood transfusions. Already 2 of the babies died.
http://www.thestar.com/News/article/177069

GAMZu

Thu, Feb 01 2007, 4:14 pm

Wow. Poor babies. Although I do wonder who is essentially right in this case. In Jewish law, any medical procedure is allowed if it will save a life, so I can't compare. But I wonder how I'd feel if the govt. felt it can decide for me and violate my religious rights.

Page 1 of 1