Depp VS Heard continued

amother

Bone

Thu, May 26 2022, 5:37 pm

amother [ Diamond ] wrote:

covert narcs are all about making a great impression with the world, while quietly abusing their victims behind closed doors. This ensures that nobody believes the victim because they're the 'nicest guy'

Yes. And normal nice guys also shake hands with people. Because theyre nice and pleasant and thats what you do.

amother

Brunette

Thu, May 26 2022, 5:43 pm

amother [ Lavender ] wrote:

But wouldn’t a nice person who is likable and easy with ppl also shake hands with everyone?
Or do we assume if someone makes a great impression they must be a covert narcissist.

If a person is a covert narcissist wouldn’t the ppl he’s known for years or dated in the past say that or is it something that could’ve started only recently? We hear everyone liked him. Even the crews (accept he would show up late)

We are not told the same about heard. Most of her friends don’t even speak to her anymore. They even testified as much. She is the one known to be violent in past. She was even arrested

Nice people do the same without the charm.
Note the good friend that he cut out of his life suddenly. Note Ellen Barkin's testimony.

Nice people don't write psychopathic texts.

amother

Bone

Thu, May 26 2022, 5:49 pm

amother [ Brunette ] wrote:

Nice people do the same without the charm.
Note the good friend that he cut out of his life suddenly. Note Ellen Barkin's testimony.

Nice people don't write psychopathic texts.

You were specifically addressing the shaking hands as indicative of him being a narcisssist. Shaking hands, even "charmingly" is done by normal people. My father was very very charming, and he would shake hands and make the best eye contact with a soft smile, and everyone went gaga and....he was just a nice guy. Not a narcissist.

amother

Bone

Thu, May 26 2022, 5:51 pm

amother [ Brunette ] wrote:

Nice people don't write psychopathic texts.

Ive said awful things about a guy that sxually took advantage of me when I was 16. I was very very graphic and full of passion and pain, and I said very nasty things about what should happen to him.

Happens to be I didnt put it in a text, but theres not much difference. People in pain can say horrible things. Doesnt make you evil. It makes you wronged and hurting.

amother

Catmint

Thu, May 26 2022, 5:54 pm

amother [ Bone ] wrote:

But now the jury may think that it didn't stop just by a text and amber was right with the way her behaved and abused her

amother

Lavender

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:07 pm

amother [ Catmint ] wrote:

I agree that she was well prepared and make a great impression in all media outlets who mocked her since the beginning of this trail.

On the contrary, the same live law and crime Q&A today said that Johnny did a way better job when he was on the trial the first time. He didn't come across as prepared and confident

The jury is most important.
From ppl in the courtroom it sounds like the jury reacted better to Depp then heard. Maybe he seemed more vulnerable or sincere or honest or relatable.
We really can’t know.

amother

Lavender

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:10 pm

amother [ Catmint ] wrote:

But now the jury may think that it didn't stop just by a text and amber was right with the way her behaved and abused her

To me it’s a stretch someone wrote nasty things to beating
Someone has to be known to be violent to come to that conclusion. The tmz video conveys much more violence.
And again no one has come forward that he hit them otherwise. He was never arrested for violence. Ppl who have liked him continue to like him.

The pattern for violence and ostracizing ppl isn’t there like it is for Heard.

amother

Currant

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:23 pm

amother [ Valerian ] wrote:

Are you all on Ambers side?? bahahahahaah nebach.

At all not. Jd team is just staying out of it. If you saw the first thread you'll know why. Iykyk.

amother

Tanzanite

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:24 pm

amother [ Valerian ] wrote:

Are you all on Ambers side?? bahahahahaah nebach.

Different posters I guess. I thought it was beyond stupid of her to get in the stand today and open herself up to all of that. She doesn't come across as honest, sincere, or likeable. I think she put the final nail in her coffin.

amother

Tanzanite

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:27 pm

amother [ Brunette ] wrote:

Nice people do the same without the charm.
Note the good friend that he cut out of his life suddenly. Note Ellen Barkin's testimony.

Nice people don't write psychopathic texts.

So anyone who's charming is suspect?

And to your second point, what about two Amber's very good friends who all testified that they cut off contact with her?

And nice people can send angry mean texts.

amother

Catmint

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:30 pm

amother [ Valerian ] wrote:

Are you all on Ambers side?? bahahahahaah nebach.

You can start a spin off if you find this thread to be full of nebechdiga posters

amother

Coral

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:32 pm

PTSD no
Heard comes across as gaslighting violent mood swinging BPD manipulative pathological liar.
While she can spin a tear jerking tale she not only cannot bring any proof whatsoever but rather all the evidence contradicts her narrative.
Do I like Depp? no.
But I do like when claims have to be substantiated.
And I don't like liars.
Or gaslighting.
Or violence.
He had a black eye from her on their honeymoon? nebach
Took him time to extricate from her vindictive insanity.
She tried to take her revenge.
Backlash and boomeranged in her face though took some years.
Seems there is a place in this world for attorneys though they can have a bad rep. Sometimes ya gotta hire a legal gun to pursue justice IY"H.

amother

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:32 pm

amother [ Currant ] wrote:

another [Valerian] wrote:

Are you all on Ambers side?? bahahahahaah nebach.

At all not. Jd team is just staying out of it. If you saw the first thread you'll know why. Iykyk.

Trying to keep this thread from getting locked.
If you have something substantial to say- great.

I will personally report any name calling.

Thank you.

amother

Brunette

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:36 pm

amother [ Catmint ] wrote:

But now the jury may think that it didn't stop just by a text and amber was right with the way her behaved and abused her

Remember that the vote is if the oped caused his work to suffer, and the reverse - if she lost her roles and reputation due to his/lawyers statements.

They're not going to be voting on who is the perpetrator or victim of abuse.

amother

Catmint

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:39 pm

amother [ OP ] wrote:

Trying to keep this thread from getting locked.
If you have something substantial to say- great.

I will personally report any name calling.

Thank you.

Thank you op for starting this thread and trying to keep it from being locked

amother

Lavender

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:39 pm

amother [ Brunette ] wrote:

The abuse aspect is very important.
Depp can only win if they can prove
1. She wrote the opEd
2. It was about Depp
3. He did not abuse her (it was false)
4. His work was affected.

If the jury believes he abused her he lost.

If he lost work from the opEd but it was true then it was fine.

I can’t imagine he will win. Mainly bec he hurt his own career.

She has to prove to win:
1. Waldler spoke to the daily mail at Depp’s request
2. The statements of what she did were false (did she abuse him)
3. Her work suffered bec of the article.

I think she will lose. #1 is impossible to prove. And I think #3 they showed pretty well it didn’t affect her work.

So I think they will both lose.

amother

Currant

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:44 pm

amother [ OP ] wrote:

Trying to keep this thread from getting locked.
If you have something substantial to say- great.

I will personally report any name calling.

Thank you.

Name calling??? She asked a question, I answered!

amother

Thu, May 26 2022, 6:47 pm

amother [ Currant ] wrote:

Name calling??? She asked question, I answered!

The question labeled certain people nebachs.
That is name calling.

Please everyone behave yourselves.
I shall be eternally grateful.